WallStSmart

CN Energy Group Inc (CNEY)vsSherwin-Williams Co (SHW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sherwin-Williams Co generates 67185% more annual revenue ($23.94B vs $35.57M). SHW leads profitability with a 10.9% profit margin vs -31.3%. SHW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CNEY

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.7Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 11.78

SHW

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.54
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNEYOvervalued (-12.0%)

Margin of Safety

-12.0%

Fair Value

$0.92

Current Price

$0.95

$0.03 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.92Overvalued
SHWUndervalued (+4.8%)

Margin of Safety

+4.8%

Fair Value

$320.70

Current Price

$300.09

$20.61 discount

UndervaluedFair: $320.70Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNEY4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
76.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 76.7% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
11.7810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

SHW2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
58.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 59 in profit

Market CapQuality
$73.12B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CNEY4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$8.20M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.1%2/10

ROE of -4.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.4%2/10

Revenue declined 2.4%

SHW4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.294/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
16.6x4/10

Trading at 16.6x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.544/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNEY

The strongest argument for CNEY centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : SHW

The strongest argument for SHW centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : CNEY

The primary concerns for CNEY are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : SHW

The primary concerns for SHW are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Debt-to-equity of 3.11 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNEY profiles as a turnaround stock while SHW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNEY carries more volatility with a beta of 1.69 — expect wider price swings.

SHW is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

SHW generates stronger free cash flow (800,000), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SHW scores higher overall (56/100 vs 39/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CN Energy Group Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · China

CN Energy Group. The company is headquartered in Lishui, China.

Sherwin-Williams Co

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sherwin Williams Company is a Cleveland, Ohio based company in the paint and coating manufacturing industry. The company primarily engages in the manufacture, distribution, and sale of paints, coatings, floorcoverings, and related products to professional, industrial, commercial, and retail customers primarily in North and South America and Europe.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?