WallStSmart

Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT)vsSherwin-Williams Co (SHW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sherwin-Williams Co generates 8510% more annual revenue ($23.57B vs $273.80M). SHW leads profitability with a 10.9% profit margin vs 4.1%. CMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.36. SHW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

CMT

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

SHW

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMTSignificantly Overvalued (-128.7%)

Margin of Safety

-128.7%

Fair Value

$8.77

Current Price

$21.06

$12.29 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.77Overvalued
SHWSignificantly Overvalued (-237.9%)

Margin of Safety

-237.9%

Fair Value

$92.84

Current Price

$321.95

$229.11 premium

UndervaluedFair: $92.84Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMT4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.5%8/10

19.5% revenue growth

SHW2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
59.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 59 in profit

Market CapQuality
$77.79B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$177.19M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.3%3/10

ROE of 7.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

4.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
5.0%3/10

Operating margin of 5.0%

SHW4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
17.2x4/10

Trading at 17.2x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.4%4/10

1.4% earnings growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.632/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMT

The strongest argument for CMT centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 19.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.36 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SHW

The strongest argument for SHW centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : CMT

The primary concerns for CMT are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 4.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SHW

The primary concerns for SHW are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMT profiles as a growth stock while SHW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SHW carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

CMT is growing revenue faster at 19.5% — sustainability is the question.

SHW generates stronger free cash flow (862M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMT scores higher overall (54/100 vs 54/100) and 19.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Core Molding Technologies Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Core Molding Technologies, Inc., is dedicated to the molding of thermoplastic and thermoset structural products. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Sherwin-Williams Co

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sherwin Williams Company is a Cleveland, Ohio based company in the paint and coating manufacturing industry. The company primarily engages in the manufacture, distribution, and sale of paints, coatings, floorcoverings, and related products to professional, industrial, commercial, and retail customers primarily in North and South America and Europe.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?