WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 49% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $33.89B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 7.9%. CMI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.85. CMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

CMI

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

UL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMISignificantly Overvalued (-58.4%)

Margin of Safety

-58.4%

Fair Value

$378.02

Current Price

$679.55

$301.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $378.02Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$94.23B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$130.20B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CMI4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.854/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
10.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

CMI is growing revenue faster at 2.7% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMI scores higher overall (47/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?