WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 366% more annual revenue ($33.89B vs $7.27B). CMI leads profitability with a 7.9% profit margin vs 3.6%. CMI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.85. RUSHA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

CMI

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMISignificantly Overvalued (-58.4%)

Margin of Safety

-58.4%

Fair Value

$378.02

Current Price

$679.55

$301.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $378.02Overvalued
RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$94.23B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CMI4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.854/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

CMI is growing revenue faster at 2.7% — sustainability is the question.

CMI generates stronger free cash flow (120M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CMI scores higher overall (47/100 vs 47/100). RUSHA offers better value entry with a 55.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?