WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 18% more annual revenue ($33.67B vs $28.48B). CMI leads profitability with a 8.4% profit margin vs 3.6%. CMI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.76. CMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CMI

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

PWR

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMISignificantly Overvalued (-61.7%)

Margin of Safety

-61.7%

Fair Value

$370.38

Current Price

$671.01

$300.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $370.38Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PWR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$88.34B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
41.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 41.4% YoY

PWR2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$109.21B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.7%8/10

19.7% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CMI3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.764/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
31.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.064/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
12.2x4/10

Trading at 12.2x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 19.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. A P/E of 100.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while PWR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

PWR is growing revenue faster at 19.7% — sustainability is the question.

CMI generates stronger free cash flow (990M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMI scores higher overall (59/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?