WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsIES Holdings Inc (IESC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 864% more annual revenue ($33.67B vs $3.49B). IESC leads profitability with a 9.8% profit margin vs 8.4%. CMI trades at a lower P/E of 31.1x. CMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CMI

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.91

IESC

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 4.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMISignificantly Overvalued (-61.7%)

Margin of Safety

-61.7%

Fair Value

$370.38

Current Price

$671.01

$300.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $370.38Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for IESC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$88.34B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
41.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 41.4% YoY

IESC5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Return on EquityProfitability
41.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 42 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
65.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 65.8% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.7310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.2%8/10

16.2% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CMI3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.764/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
31.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

IESC2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
11.9x4/10

Trading at 11.9x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : IESC

The strongest argument for IESC centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 16.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : IESC

The primary concerns for IESC are P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while IESC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

IESC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.67 — expect wider price swings.

IESC is growing revenue faster at 16.2% — sustainability is the question.

CMI generates stronger free cash flow (990M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMI scores higher overall (59/100 vs 58/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

IES Holdings Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

IES Holdings, Inc. designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?