WallStSmart

Cummins Inc (CMI)vsGraham Corporation (GHM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cummins Inc generates 14168% more annual revenue ($33.89B vs $237.56M). CMI leads profitability with a 7.9% profit margin vs 6.3%. CMI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.58. GHM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

CMI

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.99

GHM

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 2.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 1/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CMI.

GHMSignificantly Overvalued (-57.9%)

Margin of Safety

-57.9%

Fair Value

$55.91

Current Price

$107.10

$51.19 premium

UndervaluedFair: $55.91Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMI2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$92.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

GHM3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
78.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 78.6% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.5%8/10

Revenue surging 20.5% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CMI4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.584/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

GHM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
9.0x4/10

Trading at 9.0x book value

Market CapQuality
$1.19B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.3%3/10

6.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMI

The strongest argument for CMI centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : GHM

The strongest argument for GHM centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CMI

The primary concerns for CMI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : GHM

The primary concerns for GHM are Price/Book, Market Cap, Profit Margin. A P/E of 79.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMI profiles as a value stock while GHM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

GHM is growing revenue faster at 20.5% — sustainability is the question.

CMI generates stronger free cash flow (120M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GHM scores higher overall (50/100 vs 47/100) and 20.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cummins Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Cummins is a Columbus, Indiana based multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and distributes engines, filtration, and power generation products. Cummins also services engines and related equipment, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission control, electrical power generation systems, and trucks.

Graham Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Graham Corporation designs, manufactures and supplies vacuum and heat transfer equipment for the chemical, defense, petrochemical, oil refining, power generation / alternative energy and other industries. The company is headquartered in Batavia, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?