WallStSmart

Cambium Networks Corp (CMBM)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 11511% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $172.22M). NOK leads profitability with a 4.0% profit margin vs -57.0%. CMBM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. CMBM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

CMBM

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 8.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.39

NOK

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CMBMUndervalued (+66.2%)

Margin of Safety

+66.2%

Fair Value

$3.93

Current Price

$0.40

$3.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $3.93Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NOK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMBM3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
569.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 569.0% YoY

NOK2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$94.07B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CMBM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$49.99M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.763/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.554/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.8%3/10

ROE of 3.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMBM

The strongest argument for CMBM centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : CMBM

The primary concerns for CMBM are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 105.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMBM profiles as a turnaround stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMBM carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CMBM scores higher overall (53/100 vs 33/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cambium Networks Corp

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Cambium Networks Corporation provides wireless broadband network infrastructure products and solutions for network operators. The company is headquartered in Rolling Meadows, Illinois.

Visit Website →

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?