WallStSmart

Cellectis SA (CLLS)vsModerna Inc (MRNA)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Moderna Inc generates 3391% more annual revenue ($2.23B vs $63.82M). CLLS leads profitability with a -102.3% profit margin vs -141.4%. MRNA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 21/100 (F).

CLLS

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -1.31

MRNA

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLLSUndervalued (+87.3%)

Margin of Safety

+87.3%

Fair Value

$28.65

Current Price

$1.17

$27.48 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.65Overvalued
MRNAUndervalued (+69.9%)

Margin of Safety

+69.9%

Fair Value

$134.71

Current Price

$222.76

$88.05 discount

UndervaluedFair: $134.71Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLLS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MRNA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$87.04B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CLLS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$93.23M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-112.3%2/10

ROE of -112.3% — below average capital efficiency

MRNA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
13.1x4/10

Trading at 13.1x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.1%4/10

2.1% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-46.6%2/10

ROE of -46.6% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLLS

The strongest argument for CLLS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : MRNA

The strongest argument for MRNA centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : CLLS

The primary concerns for CLLS are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.06 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MRNA

The primary concerns for MRNA are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLLS carries more volatility with a beta of 2.91 — expect wider price swings.

MRNA is growing revenue faster at 2.1% — sustainability is the question.

CLLS generates stronger free cash flow (-15M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor BIOTECHNOLOGY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CLLS scores higher overall (21/100 vs 21/100). MRNA offers better value entry with a 69.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Avoid" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cellectis SA

HEALTHCARE · BIOTECHNOLOGY · USA

Cellectis SA, a clinical-stage biotechnology company, develops immuno-oncology products based on gene-edited T cells that express chimeric antigen receptors to attack and eradicate cancer cells. The company is headquartered in Paris, France.

Visit Website →

Moderna Inc

HEALTHCARE · BIOTECHNOLOGY · USA

Moderna, Inc., a biotechnology company, develops messenger RNA-based vaccines and therapies for the treatment of infectious diseases, immuno-oncology, rare diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and autoimmune diseases. The company is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?