WallStSmart

C3is Inc. (CISS)vsStar Bulk Carriers Corp (SBLK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Star Bulk Carriers Corp generates 3001% more annual revenue ($1.04B vs $33.61M). CISS leads profitability with a 16.1% profit margin vs 8.1%. CISS trades at a lower P/E of 0.0x. CISS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

CISS

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0

SBLK

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 9.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.17
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CISSUndervalued (+100.0%)

Margin of Safety

+100.0%

Fair Value

$3725.28

Current Price

$0.85

$3724.43 discount

UndervaluedFair: $3725.28Overvalued
SBLKUndervalued (+27.9%)

Margin of Safety

+27.9%

Fair Value

$33.23

Current Price

$22.86

$10.37 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CISS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
0.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.6%

SBLK3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
59.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 59.6% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
26.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.7%

Areas to Watch

CISS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1.9%4/10

1.9% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$2.28M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.43M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SBLK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.954/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.4%3/10

ROE of 3.4% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CISS

The strongest argument for CISS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.1% and operating margin at 24.6%. Revenue growth of 12.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SBLK

The strongest argument for SBLK centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CISS

The primary concerns for CISS are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : SBLK

The primary concerns for SBLK are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CISS profiles as a mature stock while SBLK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CISS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.90 — expect wider price swings.

CISS is growing revenue faster at 12.1% — sustainability is the question.

SBLK generates stronger free cash flow (40M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CISS scores higher overall (64/100 vs 56/100), backed by strong 16.1% margins and 12.1% revenue growth. SBLK offers better value entry with a 27.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

C3is Inc.

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

C3is Inc. provides international seaborne transportation services. The company is headquartered in Majuro, Marshall Islands.

Star Bulk Carriers Corp

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. The company is headquartered in Maroussi, Greece.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?