WallStSmart

Ci&T Inc (CINT)vsCrowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 834% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $515.38M). CINT leads profitability with a 7.9% profit margin vs -3.4%. CINT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CINT

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.48

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.5Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CINTUndervalued (+63.6%)

Margin of Safety

+63.6%

Fair Value

$13.76

Current Price

$3.96

$9.80 discount

UndervaluedFair: $13.76Overvalued
CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-79.7%)

Margin of Safety

-79.7%

Fair Value

$373.43

Current Price

$671.02

$297.59 premium

UndervaluedFair: $373.43Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CINT3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.2%8/10

Revenue surging 23.2% year-over-year

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$195.73B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CINT3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$505.13M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
7.9%3/10

7.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.452/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
38.4x2/10

Trading at 38.4x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CINT

The strongest argument for CINT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CINT

The primary concerns for CINT are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CINT scores higher overall (59/100 vs 40/100) and 23.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ci&T Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CI&T Inc, provides strategy, design and software engineering services to enable digital transformation for companies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Campinas, Brazil.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?