WallStSmart

Ci&T Inc (CINT)vsCrowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 897% more annual revenue ($5.40B vs $541.02M). CINT leads profitability with a 6.8% profit margin vs 0.8%. CINT trades at a lower P/E of 12.0x. CINT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

CINT

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.48

CRWD

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CINTUndervalued (+75.8%)

Margin of Safety

+75.8%

Fair Value

$20.69

Current Price

$3.23

$17.46 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.69Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CINT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.9%8/10

Revenue surging 21.9% year-over-year

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$211.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.8%8/10

Revenue surging 25.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CINT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$413.40M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.8%3/10

6.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-35.3%2/10

Earnings declined 35.3%

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CINT

The strongest argument for CINT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 21.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CINT

The primary concerns for CINT are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 5168.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.8% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (406M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CINT scores higher overall (50/100 vs 43/100) and 21.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ci&T Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CI&T Inc, provides strategy, design and software engineering services to enable digital transformation for companies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Campinas, Brazil.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?