WallStSmart

Energy of Minas Gerais Co DRC (CIG-C)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy of Minas Gerais Co DRC generates 1861% more annual revenue ($43.37B vs $2.21B). CIG-C leads profitability with a 11.2% profit margin vs -7.7%. CIG-C appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.33. CIG-C earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

CIG-C

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.68

TAC

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CIG-CUndervalued (+45.8%)

Margin of Safety

+45.8%

Fair Value

$5.44

Current Price

$2.96

$2.48 discount

UndervaluedFair: $5.44Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CIG-C4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
9.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.05B8/10

Generating 1.0B in free cash flow

TAC0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

CIG-C3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.8%2/10

Earnings declined 5.8%

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.3x4/10

Trading at 11.3x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CIG-C

The strongest argument for CIG-C centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TAC

TAC has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : CIG-C

The primary concerns for CIG-C are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 3.17 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CIG-C profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

CIG-C is growing revenue faster at 6.3% — sustainability is the question.

CIG-C generates stronger free cash flow (1.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CIG-C scores higher overall (60/100 vs 33/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy of Minas Gerais Co DRC

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Companhia Energtica de Minas Gerais, is dedicated to the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of energy in Brazil. The company is headquartered in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?