WallStSmart

Energy of Minas Gerais Co DRC (CIG-C)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Energy of Minas Gerais Co DRC generates 1830% more annual revenue ($43.74B vs $2.27B). CIG-C leads profitability with a 10.5% profit margin vs -1.0%. CIG-C appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.33. CIG-C earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

CIG-C

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.68

TAC

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CIG-CUndervalued (+46.6%)

Margin of Safety

+46.6%

Fair Value

$5.52

Current Price

$3.36

$2.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $5.52Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CIG-C3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
10.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TAC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.3%

Areas to Watch

CIG-C4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.4%4/10

3.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.4%2/10

Earnings declined 20.4%

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-71.6%2/10

Earnings declined 71.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CIG-C

The strongest argument for CIG-C centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TAC

The strongest argument for TAC centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CIG-C

The primary concerns for CIG-C are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.38 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CIG-C profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

TAC is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

CIG-C generates stronger free cash flow (525M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CIG-C scores higher overall (60/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy of Minas Gerais Co DRC

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Companhia Energtica de Minas Gerais, is dedicated to the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of energy in Brazil. The company is headquartered in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?