WallStSmart

Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd (CHT)vsKT Corporation (KT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

KT Corporation generates 11626% more annual revenue ($28.18T vs $240.29B). CHT leads profitability with a 16.2% profit margin vs 5.5%. CHT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.69. CHT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CHT

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.96

KT

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.74
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CHTUndervalued (+65.7%)

Margin of Safety

+65.7%

Fair Value

$123.58

Current Price

$44.56

$79.02 discount

UndervaluedFair: $123.58Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CHT3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.109/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
21.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$6.79B8/10

Generating 6.8B in free cash flow

KT3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$93.74B10/10

Generating 93.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CHT4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.694/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
11.1x4/10

Trading at 11.1x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
3.2%4/10

3.2% earnings growth

KT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.744/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.8%3/10

ROE of 4.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.5%3/10

5.5% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
4.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CHT

The strongest argument for CHT centers on Debt/Equity, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.2% and operating margin at 21.8%.

Bull Case : KT

The strongest argument for KT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CHT

The primary concerns for CHT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : KT

The primary concerns for KT are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CHT profiles as a mature stock while KT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CHT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.11 — expect wider price swings.

CHT is growing revenue faster at 7.5% — sustainability is the question.

KT generates stronger free cash flow (93.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CHT scores higher overall (59/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 16.2% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. provides telecommunications services in Taiwan. The company is headquartered in Taipei City, Taiwan.

KT Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

KT Corporation provides integrated telecommunications and platform services in Korea and internationally. The company is headquartered in Seongnam, South Korea.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?