WallStSmart

Cognex Corporation (CGNX)vsFortive Corp (FTV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fortive Corp generates 296% more annual revenue ($4.32B vs $1.09B). CGNX leads profitability with a 16.1% profit margin vs 12.4%. FTV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. CGNX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

CGNX

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.09

FTV

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CGNXUndervalued (+49.3%)

Margin of Safety

+49.3%

Fair Value

$84.85

Current Price

$64.22

$20.63 discount

UndervaluedFair: $84.85Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FTV.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CGNX5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
79.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 79.2% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
29.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.9%8/10

16.9% revenue growth

FTV1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CGNX2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
59.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

FTV2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
4.0%4/10

4.0% earnings growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CGNX

The strongest argument for CGNX centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.1% and operating margin at 29.4%. Revenue growth of 16.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FTV

The strongest argument for FTV centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CGNX

The primary concerns for CGNX are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 59.9x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : FTV

The primary concerns for FTV are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CGNX profiles as a growth stock while FTV is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CGNX carries more volatility with a beta of 1.49 — expect wider price swings.

CGNX is growing revenue faster at 16.9% — sustainability is the question.

FTV generates stronger free cash flow (258M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CGNX scores higher overall (60/100 vs 56/100), backed by strong 16.1% margins and 16.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cognex Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Cognex Corporation offers machine vision products that capture and analyze visual information to automate manufacturing and distribution tasks globally. The company is headquartered in Natick, Massachusetts.

Visit Website →

Fortive Corp

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Fortive is an American diversified industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?