WallStSmart

CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 9246% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $803.60M). LMT leads profitability with a 6.4% profit margin vs 1.7%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

CECO

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.82

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CECO.

LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-53.9%)

Margin of Safety

-53.9%

Fair Value

$340.34

Current Price

$519.10

$178.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $340.34Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CECO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.5%8/10

16.5% revenue growth

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
64.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 64 in profit

Market CapQuality
$118.38B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CECO4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
9.0x4/10

Trading at 9.0x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
5.5%3/10

ROE of 5.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.7%3/10

1.7% margin — thin

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
15.9x4/10

Trading at 15.9x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CECO

The strongest argument for CECO centers on Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CECO

The primary concerns for CECO are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 254.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CECO profiles as a growth stock while LMT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CECO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.50 — expect wider price swings.

CECO is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.

CECO generates stronger free cash flow (-5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (55/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CECO Environmental Corp.

INDUSTRIALS · POLLUTION & TREATMENT CONTROLS · USA

CECO Environmental Corporation. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?