WallStSmart

COPT Defense Properties (CDP)vsHudson Pacific Properties Inc (HPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Hudson Pacific Properties Inc generates 4% more annual revenue ($815.25M vs $780.54M). CDP leads profitability with a 20.0% profit margin vs -65.0%. CDP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.03. CDP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

CDP

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.42

HPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CDPUndervalued (+18.0%)

Margin of Safety

+18.0%

Fair Value

$39.52

Current Price

$32.65

$6.87 discount

UndervaluedFair: $39.52Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for HPP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CDP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
20.0%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.6%

HPP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CDP4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Debt/EquityHealth
1.713/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.422/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

HPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.293/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
6.932/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-18.4%2/10

ROE of -18.4% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.0%2/10

Revenue declined 8.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CDP

The strongest argument for CDP centers on Profit Margin, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.0% and operating margin at 29.6%. PEG of 1.03 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : HPP

The strongest argument for HPP centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CDP

The primary concerns for CDP are P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.71 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : HPP

The primary concerns for HPP are Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CDP profiles as a mature stock while HPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

HPP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.97 — expect wider price swings.

CDP is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

CDP generates stronger free cash flow (77M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CDP scores higher overall (64/100 vs 32/100), backed by strong 20.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

COPT Defense Properties

REAL ESTATE · REIT - OFFICE · USA

COPT Defense Properties (CDP) is a specialized real estate investment trust (REIT) that concentrates on the acquisition, development, and management of properties catering to defense and government contractors. Positioned near key defense installations, CDP is strategically aligned to provide stable, long-term cash flows while effectively meeting the evolving demands of its tenants. The company’s disciplined capital allocation strategy, combined with a robust development pipeline, reinforces its commitment to enhancing shareholder value while contributing to national security initiatives.

Hudson Pacific Properties Inc

REAL ESTATE · REIT - OFFICE · USA

Hudson Pacific is a real estate investment trust with a portfolio of office and studio properties totaling nearly 19 million square feet, including development land.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?