WallStSmart

Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. Class A Common Stock (CDNL)vsMasTec Inc (MTZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MasTec Inc generates 3519% more annual revenue ($14.30B vs $395.16M). CDNL leads profitability with a 6.1% profit margin vs 2.8%. MTZ trades at a lower P/E of 61.3x. MTZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CDNL

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.3Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 5.0

MTZ

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CDNLSignificantly Overvalued (-5975.6%)

Margin of Safety

-5975.6%

Fair Value

$0.41

Current Price

$34.72

$34.31 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.41Overvalued
MTZOvervalued (-7.7%)

Margin of Safety

-7.7%

Fair Value

$246.17

Current Price

$323.55

$77.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $246.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CDNL2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
60.2%10/10

Revenue surging 60.2% year-over-year

MTZ2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
92.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 92.8% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.8%8/10

15.8% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CDNL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.42B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.1%3/10

6.1% margin — thin

MTZ3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.964/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

2.8% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
61.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CDNL

The strongest argument for CDNL centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 60.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MTZ

The strongest argument for MTZ centers on EPS Growth, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 15.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CDNL

The primary concerns for CDNL are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 553.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : MTZ

The primary concerns for MTZ are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 61.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CDNL profiles as a hypergrowth stock while MTZ is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CDNL is growing revenue faster at 60.2% — sustainability is the question.

MTZ generates stronger free cash flow (214M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MTZ scores higher overall (58/100 vs 40/100) and 15.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. Class A Common Stock

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc., a civil contracting company, provides infrastructure services to the residential, commercial, industrial, municipal, and state infrastructure markets in the United States. The company is headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina.

MasTec Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

MasTec, Inc., an infrastructure construction company, provides engineering, construction, installation, maintenance, and upgrade services for communications, energy, utilities, and other infrastructure primarily in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?