WallStSmart

Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (CD)vsInteractive Brokers Group Inc (IBKR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Interactive Brokers Group Inc generates 264894% more annual revenue ($6.83B vs $2.58M). IBKR leads profitability with a 16.5% profit margin vs -182.5%. IBKR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

CD

Avoid

24

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -9.37

IBKR

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.41

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CD2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
98.4%10/10

Revenue surging 98.4% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

IBKR5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Operating MarginProfitability
76.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 76.5%

Market CapQuality
$155.68B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.3%8/10

Revenue surging 26.3% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
35.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 35.3% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$6.20B8/10

Generating 6.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$323.41M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-13.4%2/10

ROE of -13.4% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-9.372/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

IBKR4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.412/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
7.691/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CD

The strongest argument for CD centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 98.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : IBKR

The strongest argument for IBKR centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.5% and operating margin at 76.5%. Revenue growth of 26.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CD

The primary concerns for CD are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : IBKR

The primary concerns for IBKR are P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 7.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CD profiles as a hypergrowth stock while IBKR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CD carries more volatility with a beta of 8.54 — expect wider price swings.

CD is growing revenue faster at 98.4% — sustainability is the question.

IBKR generates stronger free cash flow (6.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IBKR scores higher overall (72/100 vs 24/100), backed by strong 16.5% margins and 26.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Chaince Digital Holdings Inc.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · China

Chindata Group Holdings Limited offers operator neutral hyperscale data center solutions in China, India and Southeast Asia. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Interactive Brokers Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is a global automated electronic broker. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?