WallStSmart

Crown Holdings Inc (CCK)vsKarat Packaging Inc (KRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crown Holdings Inc generates 2548% more annual revenue ($12.74B vs $481.07M). KRT leads profitability with a 6.6% profit margin vs 5.7%. CCK trades at a lower P/E of 18.6x. CCK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

CCK

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.81

KRT

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CCK.

KRTSignificantly Overvalued (-31.6%)

Margin of Safety

-31.6%

Fair Value

$19.87

Current Price

$40.23

$20.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $19.87Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CCK2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
27.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 27 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.668/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

KRT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
21.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Areas to Watch

CCK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.814/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.7%3/10

5.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.5%2/10

Earnings declined 5.5%

Debt/EquityHealth
2.111/10

Elevated debt levels

KRT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Market CapQuality
$817.51M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.6%3/10

6.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CCK

The strongest argument for CCK centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 12.9% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.66 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : KRT

The strongest argument for KRT centers on Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 12.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CCK

The primary concerns for CCK are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.11 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : KRT

The primary concerns for KRT are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KRT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.82 — expect wider price swings.

KRT is growing revenue faster at 12.9% — sustainability is the question.

CCK generates stronger free cash flow (597M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor PACKAGING & CONTAINERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CCK scores higher overall (63/100 vs 46/100) and 12.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crown Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PACKAGING & CONTAINERS · USA

Crown Holdings, Inc. designs, manufactures and sells products and packaging equipment for consumer goods and industrial products in the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Yardley, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Karat Packaging Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PACKAGING & CONTAINERS · USA

Karat Packaging Inc. manufactures and distributes single-use disposable products in plastic, paper, biopolymers, and other compostable forms that are primarily used in restaurants and food service areas. The company is headquartered in Chino, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?