WallStSmart

Cboe Global Markets Inc (CBOE)vsIntercontinental Exchange Inc (ICE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Intercontinental Exchange Inc generates 118% more annual revenue ($10.44B vs $4.79B). ICE leads profitability with a 37.7% profit margin vs 25.8%. CBOE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.13. ICE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

CBOE

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.58

ICE

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.60

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CBOE5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
54.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 54.4% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
23.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
25.8%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.299/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

ICE6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Profit MarginProfitability
37.7%10/10

Keeps 38 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
57.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 57.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
79.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 79.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$80.52B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.4%8/10

Revenue surging 20.4% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CBOE2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.134/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
25.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

ICE2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.254/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.602/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CBOE

The strongest argument for CBOE centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.8% and operating margin at 39.7%.

Bull Case : ICE

The strongest argument for ICE centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 37.7% and operating margin at 57.3%. Revenue growth of 20.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CBOE

The primary concerns for CBOE are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : ICE

The primary concerns for ICE are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CBOE profiles as a mature stock while ICE is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ICE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

ICE is growing revenue faster at 20.4% — sustainability is the question.

ICE generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ICE scores higher overall (74/100 vs 70/100), backed by strong 37.7% margins and 20.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cboe Global Markets Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · FINANCIAL DATA & STOCK EXCHANGES · USA

Cboe Global Markets is an American company that owns the Chicago Board Options Exchange and the stock exchange operator BATS Global Markets.

Visit Website →

Intercontinental Exchange Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · FINANCIAL DATA & STOCK EXCHANGES · USA

The Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) is an American Fortune 500 company formed in 2000 that operates global exchanges, clearing houses and provides mortgage technology, data and listing services. The company owns exchanges for financial and commodity markets, and operates regulated exchanges and marketplaces.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?