WallStSmart

CACI International Inc (CACI)vsInternational Business Machines (IBM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

International Business Machines generates 652% more annual revenue ($68.91B vs $9.16B). IBM leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs 5.9%. IBM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.99. IBM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

CACI

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.65

IBM

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.29

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CACI1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

IBM3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$309.44B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
32.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.78B8/10

Generating 4.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CACI3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.313/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
514.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

IBM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.992/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CACI

The strongest argument for CACI centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : IBM

The strongest argument for IBM centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 13.8%.

Bear Case : CACI

The primary concerns for CACI are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : IBM

The primary concerns for IBM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.14 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CACI profiles as a value stock while IBM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

IBM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.58 — expect wider price swings.

IBM is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

IBM generates stronger free cash flow (4.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IBM scores higher overall (57/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CACI International Inc

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

CACI International Inc, provides information solutions and services in North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

International Business Machines

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Armonk, New York, with operations in over 170 countries. The company began in 1911, founded in Endicott, New York, as the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company (CTR) and was renamed International Business Machines in 1924. IBM is incorporated in New York. IBM produces and sells computer hardware, middleware and software, and provides hosting and consulting services in areas ranging from mainframe computers to nanotechnology. IBM is also a major research organization, holding the record for most annual U.S. patents generated by a business (as of 2020) for 28 consecutive years. Inventions by IBM include the automated teller machine (ATM), the floppy disk, the hard disk drive, the magnetic stripe card, the relational database, the SQL programming language, the UPC barcode, and dynamic random-access memory (DRAM). The IBM mainframe, exemplified by the System/360, was the dominant computing platform during the 1960s and 1970s.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?