WallStSmart

China Automotive Systems Inc (CAAS)vsO’Reilly Automotive Inc (ORLY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

O’Reilly Automotive Inc generates 2454% more annual revenue ($17.78B vs $696.27M). ORLY leads profitability with a 14.3% profit margin vs 4.2%. CAAS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.37. ORLY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

CAAS

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.14

ORLY

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CAASUndervalued (+70.1%)

Margin of Safety

+70.1%

Fair Value

$15.44

Current Price

$4.22

$11.22 discount

UndervaluedFair: $15.44Overvalued
ORLYOvervalued (-9.1%)

Margin of Safety

-9.1%

Fair Value

$86.25

Current Price

$91.16

$4.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $86.25Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAAS3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3710/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
4.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

ORLY2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
58.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 59 in profit

Market CapQuality
$74.27B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CAAS2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$129.73M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

4.2% margin — thin

ORLY3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAAS

The strongest argument for CAAS centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 11.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.37 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ORLY

The strongest argument for ORLY centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : CAAS

The primary concerns for CAAS are Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 4.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ORLY

The primary concerns for ORLY are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAAS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.86 — expect wider price swings.

CAAS is growing revenue faster at 11.1% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor AUTO PARTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ORLY scores higher overall (60/100 vs 56/100). CAAS offers better value entry with a 70.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

China Automotive Systems Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

China Automotive Systems, Inc. manufactures and sells automotive components and systems in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Jingzhou City, the People's Republic of China.

Visit Website →

O’Reilly Automotive Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

O'Reilly Auto Parts is an American auto parts retailer that provides automotive aftermarket parts, tools, supplies, equipment, and accessories in the United States serving both the professional service providers and do-it-yourself customers.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?