WallStSmart

BrightView Holdings (BV)vsCintas Corporation (CTAS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cintas Corporation generates 302% more annual revenue ($10.79B vs $2.69B). CTAS leads profitability with a 17.6% profit margin vs 1.9%. CTAS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.92. CTAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

BV

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 2.0Quality: 5.0

CTAS

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 9.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 4.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BVSignificantly Overvalued (-1084.8%)

Margin of Safety

-1084.8%

Fair Value

$1.18

Current Price

$11.97

$10.79 premium

UndervaluedFair: $1.18Overvalued
CTASSignificantly Overvalued (-78.1%)

Margin of Safety

-78.1%

Fair Value

$112.48

Current Price

$176.85

$64.37 premium

UndervaluedFair: $112.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BV1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

CTAS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
43.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$70.75B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
23.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.4%

Areas to Watch

BV4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$1.13B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

1.9% margin — thin

CTAS3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
15.2x4/10

Trading at 15.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.922/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BV

The strongest argument for BV centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : CTAS

The strongest argument for CTAS centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 23.4%.

Bear Case : BV

The primary concerns for BV are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 171.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : CTAS

The primary concerns for CTAS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BV profiles as a value stock while CTAS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

BV carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

CTAS is growing revenue faster at 9.3% — sustainability is the question.

CTAS generates stronger free cash flow (425M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CTAS scores higher overall (60/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 17.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BrightView Holdings

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

BrightView Holdings, Inc., provides commercial landscaping services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Cintas Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?