WallStSmart

BP PLC ADR (BP)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BP PLC ADR generates 24133% more annual revenue ($187.64B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 0.0%. BP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

BP

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BPSignificantly Overvalued (-4001.1%)

Margin of Safety

-4001.1%

Fair Value

$0.94

Current Price

$44.79

$43.85 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.94Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BP3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1810/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Market CapQuality
$114.71B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.14B8/10

Generating 4.1B in free cash flow

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Areas to Watch

BP4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
13.0x4/10

Trading at 13.0x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.6%4/10

3.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.7%3/10

ROE of 1.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BP

The strongest argument for BP centers on PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 0.18 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bear Case : BP

The primary concerns for BP are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity. A P/E of 2239.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BP profiles as a value stock while KEN is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

BP generates stronger free cash flow (4.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BP scores higher overall (54/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BP PLC ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

BP plc participates in the energy business globally. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?