WallStSmart

BP PLC ADR (BP)vsEnergy Transfer LP (ET)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BP PLC ADR generates 119% more annual revenue ($187.64B vs $85.54B). ET leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs 0.0%. BP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.18. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

BP

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

ET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BPSignificantly Overvalued (-4001.1%)

Margin of Safety

-4001.1%

Fair Value

$0.94

Current Price

$46.17

$45.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.94Overvalued
ETSignificantly Overvalued (-121.3%)

Margin of Safety

-121.3%

Fair Value

$8.23

Current Price

$19.14

$10.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BP3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1810/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Market CapQuality
$114.71B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.14B8/10

Generating 4.1B in free cash flow

ET5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$66.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.6%8/10

Revenue surging 29.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

BP4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
13.4x4/10

Trading at 13.4x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.6%4/10

3.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.7%3/10

ROE of 1.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

ET3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-225.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BP

The strongest argument for BP centers on PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 0.18 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ET

The strongest argument for ET centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 29.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BP

The primary concerns for BP are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity. A P/E of 2239.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ET

The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BP profiles as a value stock while ET is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

ET is growing revenue faster at 29.6% — sustainability is the question.

BP generates stronger free cash flow (4.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 54/100) and 29.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BP PLC ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

BP plc participates in the energy business globally. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Energy Transfer LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?