WallStSmart

Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 47083% more annual revenue ($1.46B vs $3.09M). SONO leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs -194.6%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

BMR

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 6.17

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BMR.

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.9%)

Margin of Safety

-34.9%

Fair Value

$12.23

Current Price

$13.62

$1.39 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BMR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
6.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

BMR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$23.76M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-59.5%2/10

ROE of -59.5% — below average capital efficiency

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.68B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BMR

The strongest argument for BMR centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : BMR

The primary concerns for BMR are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 82.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BMR profiles as a turnaround stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BMR carries more volatility with a beta of 3.65 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

BMR generates stronger free cash flow (-2M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 21/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) is a leading innovator in video optimization and image compression technology, revolutionizing the efficiency of content delivery across streaming platforms and media networks. With its cutting-edge proprietary algorithms, Beamr empowers broadcasters and content creators to deliver premium video quality while significantly lowering bandwidth expenses. As the appetite for high-resolution content surges, Beamr's solutions enhance viewer engagement and facilitate a competitive advantage for businesses navigating the rapidly evolving digital media landscape. The company's strategic positioning and technological prowess make it a key player in shaping the future of media consumption.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?