WallStSmart

Baidu Inc (BIDU)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Baidu Inc generates 16570% more annual revenue ($129.08B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 4.3%. BIDU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

BIDU

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.40

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BIDUSignificantly Overvalued (-1147.8%)

Margin of Safety

-1147.8%

Fair Value

$11.63

Current Price

$115.60

$103.97 premium

UndervaluedFair: $11.63Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BIDU2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.668/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Areas to Watch

BIDU4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.9%3/10

ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BIDU

The strongest argument for BIDU centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.66 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bear Case : BIDU

The primary concerns for BIDU are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. A P/E of 65.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BIDU profiles as a value stock while KEN is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

BIDU generates stronger free cash flow (88M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BIDU scores higher overall (46/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Baidu Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · INTERNET CONTENT & INFORMATION · China

Baidu, Inc. provides Internet search services primarily in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?