WallStSmart

Baidu Inc (BIDU)vsPhoenix New Media Limited (FENG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Baidu Inc generates 16004% more annual revenue ($128.70B vs $799.17M). FENG leads profitability with a 1.7% profit margin vs 1.0%. FENG appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.58. FENG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

BIDU

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.18

FENG

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.0Value: 9.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BIDU.

FENGUndervalued (+72.2%)

Margin of Safety

+72.2%

Fair Value

$6.41

Current Price

$1.61

$4.80 discount

UndervaluedFair: $6.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BIDU3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.688/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.67B8/10

Generating 2.7B in free cash flow

FENG5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.6%8/10

Revenue surging 21.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

BIDU4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.7%3/10

ROE of 7.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

1.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.2%2/10

Revenue declined 1.2%

FENG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.904/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$19.34M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.7%3/10

1.7% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BIDU

The strongest argument for BIDU centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 0.68 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : FENG

The strongest argument for FENG centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 21.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BIDU

The primary concerns for BIDU are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 1.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FENG

The primary concerns for FENG are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 1.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BIDU profiles as a value stock while FENG is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

BIDU carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.

FENG is growing revenue faster at 21.6% — sustainability is the question.

BIDU generates stronger free cash flow (2.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FENG scores higher overall (50/100 vs 47/100) and 21.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Baidu Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · INTERNET CONTENT & INFORMATION · China

Baidu, Inc. provides Internet search services primarily in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Phoenix New Media Limited

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · INTERNET CONTENT & INFORMATION · China

Phoenix New Media Limited offers content on an integrated Internet platform in the People's Republic of China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?