WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 1606% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $3.17B). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs 19.0%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.25. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BHPUndervalued (+57.8%)

Margin of Safety

+57.8%

Fair Value

$188.60

Current Price

$68.77

$119.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $188.60Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP6 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

Market CapQuality
$166.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

BHP1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (64/100 vs 60/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?