WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsNamib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 65265% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $82.59M). NAMM leads profitability with a 122.5% profit margin vs 19.0%. NAMM trades at a lower P/E of 1.0x. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.24

NAMM

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 7.98

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$208.94B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

NAMM5 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
1.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Profit MarginProfitability
122.5%10/10

Keeps 123 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
31.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.6%

Debt/EquityHealth
-0.1310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
7.9810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

BHP2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

NAMM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$95.89M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NAMM

The strongest argument for NAMM centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 122.5% and operating margin at 31.6%.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : NAMM

The primary concerns for NAMM are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.82 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (65/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares

BASIC MATERIALS · GOLD · USA

Namib Minerals engages in the production, development, and exploration of gold and critical green metals.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?