WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsMcEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 22785% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $235.91M). MUX leads profitability with a 31.4% profit margin vs 19.0%. MUX trades at a lower P/E of 14.0x. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.24

MUX

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.62

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$204.85B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

MUX5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
31.4%10/10

Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
107.4%10/10

Revenue surging 107.4% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
14.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BHP2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MUX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$983.32M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.45M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MUX

The strongest argument for MUX centers on Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.4% and operating margin at 14.7%. Revenue growth of 107.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : MUX

The primary concerns for MUX are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a mature stock while MUX is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MUX carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

MUX is growing revenue faster at 107.4% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (65/100 vs 56/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

McEwen Mining Inc.

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER PRECIOUS METALS & MINING · USA

McEwen Mining Inc. is engaged in the exploration, development, production and sale of gold and silver deposits in the United States, Canada, Mexico and Argentina. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?