WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsArcelorMittal SA ADR (MT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ArcelorMittal SA ADR generates 7% more annual revenue ($62.85B vs $58.76B). BHP leads profitability with a 16.7% profit margin vs 2.9%. MT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.42. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

BHP

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.34

MT

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.37

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$229.80B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
37.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
43.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.3%8/10

18.3% revenue growth

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.66B8/10

Generating 7.7B in free cash flow

MT4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Market CapQuality
$59.37B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BHP3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

MT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.3%3/10

ROE of 3.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-61.7%2/10

Earnings declined 61.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.7% and operating margin at 43.3%. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MT

The strongest argument for MT centers on PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.42 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : MT

The primary concerns for MT are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a growth stock while MT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.75 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (7.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (57/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 16.7% margins and 18.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

ArcelorMittal SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

ArcelorMittal owns and operates steelmaking and mining facilities in Europe, North and South America, Asia and Africa. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?