WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsMativ Holdings Inc. (MATV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 2624% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $1.98B). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs 3.9%. MATV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.77. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.24

MATV

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.

MATVUndervalued (+78.9%)

Margin of Safety

+78.9%

Fair Value

$71.47

Current Price

$7.58

$63.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.47Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$230.71B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

MATV3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
5.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
6448.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 6448.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

BHP2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MATV4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$410.07M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.9%3/10

3.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.8%3/10

Operating margin of 1.8%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MATV

The strongest argument for MATV centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : MATV

The primary concerns for MATV are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.30 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 3.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a mature stock while MATV is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MATV carries more volatility with a beta of 0.86 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (62/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. MATV offers better value entry with a 78.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Mativ Holdings Inc.

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Mativ Holdings, Inc., provides advanced materials and engineering solutions for various industries worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?