WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsMativ Holdings Inc. (MATV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 2855% more annual revenue ($58.76B vs $1.99B). BHP leads profitability with a 16.7% profit margin vs 4.5%. MATV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.84. MATV earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.34

MATV

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.

MATVUndervalued (+78.3%)

Margin of Safety

+78.3%

Fair Value

$69.45

Current Price

$11.89

$57.56 discount

UndervaluedFair: $69.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$229.80B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
37.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
43.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.3%8/10

18.3% revenue growth

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.66B8/10

Generating 7.7B in free cash flow

MATV3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
6448.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 6448.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

BHP3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

MATV4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.844/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.2%4/10

1.2% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$690.98M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

4.5% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.7% and operating margin at 43.3%. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MATV

The strongest argument for MATV centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : MATV

The primary concerns for MATV are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 2.20 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a growth stock while MATV is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MATV carries more volatility with a beta of 0.87 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (7.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MATV scores higher overall (65/100 vs 57/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Mativ Holdings Inc.

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Mativ Holdings, Inc., provides advanced materials and engineering solutions for various industries worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?