WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsKnife River Corporation (KNF)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 1677% more annual revenue ($58.76B vs $3.31B). BHP leads profitability with a 16.7% profit margin vs 4.2%. KNF appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.62. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

BHP

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.34

KNF

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.20
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.

KNFSignificantly Overvalued (-84.2%)

Margin of Safety

-84.2%

Fair Value

$43.77

Current Price

$57.63

$13.86 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.77Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$229.80B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
37.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
43.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.3%8/10

18.3% revenue growth

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.66B8/10

Generating 7.7B in free cash flow

KNF1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BHP3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

KNF4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.624/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

4.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.043/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.7% and operating margin at 43.3%. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KNF

The strongest argument for KNF centers on Price/Book. Revenue growth of 12.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : KNF

The primary concerns for KNF are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 4.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a growth stock while KNF is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BHP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.85 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (7.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (57/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 16.7% margins and 18.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Knife River Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · BUILDING MATERIALS · USA

Knife River Corporation provides aggregates-based construction materials and contracting services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Bismarck, North Dakota.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?