WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsGlatfelter (GLT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 4024% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $1.31B). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs -5.1%. GLT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.80. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.24

GLT

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.62

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$230.71B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

GLT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BHP2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

GLT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.804/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.7%4/10

0.7% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.624/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$73.67M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GLT

The strongest argument for GLT centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : GLT

The primary concerns for GLT are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 4.29 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a mature stock while GLT is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

GLT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (62/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Glatfelter

BASIC MATERIALS · PAPER & PAPER PRODUCTS · USA

Glatfelter Corporation manufactures and sells engineering materials worldwide. The company is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?