BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsEastman Chemical Company (EMN)
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$87.15
-0.23%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $229.80B
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
$68.11
-0.39%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $8.05B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
BHP Group Limited generates 563% more annual revenue ($58.76B vs $8.87B). BHP leads profitability with a 16.7% profit margin vs 5.0%. EMN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.55. EMN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).
BHP
Buy57
out of 100
Grade: C
EMN
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.
Margin of Safety
-19.3%
Fair Value
$68.20
Current Price
$68.11
$0.09 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit
Strong operational efficiency at 43.3%
18.3% revenue growth
Generating 7.7B in free cash flow
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Earnings expanding 32.5% YoY
Areas to Watch
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 9.0%
ROE of 6.6% — below average capital efficiency
5.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BHP
The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.7% and operating margin at 43.3%. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : EMN
The strongest argument for EMN centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.55 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BHP
The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : EMN
The primary concerns for EMN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BHP profiles as a growth stock while EMN is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
EMN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.09 — expect wider price swings.
BHP is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.
BHP generates stronger free cash flow (7.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
EMN scores higher overall (68/100 vs 57/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
BHP Group Limited
BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Eastman Chemical Company
BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA
Eastman Chemical Company is an American company primarily involved in the chemical industry. Once a subsidiary of Kodak, today it is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. The company is headquartered in Kingsport, Tennessee.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?