BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsCelanese Corporation (CE)
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$79.30
+2.91%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $202.77B
CE
Celanese Corporation
$65.09
+0.68%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $7.29B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
BHP Group Limited generates 466% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $9.54B). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs -12.2%. CE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.42. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
BHP
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
CE
Hold47
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-84.5%
Fair Value
$43.18
Current Price
$79.30
$36.12 premium
Margin of Safety
+48.6%
Fair Value
$117.86
Current Price
$65.09
$52.77 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%
Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit
Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY
Generating 4.3B in free cash flow
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 28.2% YoY
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of -22.5% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 6.5%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BHP
The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : CE
The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : BHP
The primary concerns for BHP are PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : CE
The primary concerns for CE are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BHP profiles as a mature stock while CE is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
CE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.85 — expect wider price swings.
BHP is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.
BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BHP scores higher overall (65/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. CE offers better value entry with a 48.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
BHP Group Limited
BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Celanese Corporation
BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA
Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.
Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?