WallStSmart

Becton Dickinson and Company (BDX)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Becton Dickinson and Company generates 593% more annual revenue ($21.92B vs $3.17B). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs 8.0%. BDX appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. BDX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

BDX

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 10.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.49

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BDXUndervalued (+36.9%)

Margin of Safety

+36.9%

Fair Value

$286.42

Current Price

$158.27

$128.15 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.42Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BDX3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$56.49B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.6% YoY

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

BDX4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.492/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BDX

The strongest argument for BDX centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BDX

The primary concerns for BDX are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BDX profiles as a value stock while WAT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

BDX generates stronger free cash flow (549M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BDX scores higher overall (61/100 vs 60/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Becton Dickinson and Company

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & SUPPLIES · USA

Becton, Dickinson and Company, also known as BD, is an American multinational medical technology company that manufactures and sells medical devices, instrument systems, and reagents. BD also provides consulting and analytics services in certain geographies.

Visit Website →

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?