WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsTrane Technologies plc (TT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Trane Technologies plc generates 348% more annual revenue ($21.60B vs $4.82B). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 13.4%. BAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.36. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

BAM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9

TT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Profit MarginProfitability
51.6%10/10

Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
67.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$77.98B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

TT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Market CapQuality
$107.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.6x4/10

Trading at 9.6x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.7%2/10

Earnings declined 20.7%

TT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.394/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
37.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
12.6x4/10

Trading at 12.6x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Earnings declined 2.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TT

The strongest argument for TT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TT

The primary concerns for TT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while TT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

BAM generates stronger free cash flow (697M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BAM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 51.6% margins and 31.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Trane Technologies plc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Trane Technologies plc is an American Irish domiciled diversified industrial manufacturing company. It is headquartered near Dublin, Ireland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?