WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsRaymond James Financial Inc. (RJF)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Raymond James Financial Inc. generates 190% more annual revenue ($14.72B vs $5.07B). BAM leads profitability with a 49.7% profit margin vs 14.6%. RJF appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.84. RJF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

BAM

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.97

RJF

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.06

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
49.7%10/10

Keeps 50 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
64.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 64.5%

Market CapQuality
$76.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.8%8/10

Revenue surging 23.8% year-over-year

RJF4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.848/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
14.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.05B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

RJF1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.062/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 49.7% and operating margin at 64.5%. Revenue growth of 23.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RJF

The strongest argument for RJF centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 13.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.84 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : RJF

The primary concerns for RJF are Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while RJF is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 23.8% — sustainability is the question.

RJF generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RJF scores higher overall (70/100 vs 68/100) and 13.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Raymond James Financial Inc.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Raymond James Financial is an American multinational independent investment bank and financial services company providing financial services to individuals, corporations, and municipalities through its subsidiary companies that engage primarily in investment and financial planning, in addition to investment banking and asset management.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?