WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsP10 Inc (PX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. generates 1804% more annual revenue ($5.74B vs $301.31M). BAM leads profitability with a 48.9% profit margin vs 0.1%. BAM trades at a lower P/E of 27.2x. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 77/100 (B+).

BAM

Strong Buy

77

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.97

PX

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Profit MarginProfitability
48.9%10/10

Keeps 49 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
68.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 68.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
60.8%10/10

Revenue surging 60.8% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$75.49B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

EPS GrowthGrowth
47.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 47.4% YoY

PX1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.57B8/10

Generating 1.6B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
10.1x4/10

Trading at 10.1x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
6.0%3/10

ROE of 6.0% — below average capital efficiency

PX4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.7%4/10

0.7% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.09B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 48.9% and operating margin at 68.7%. Revenue growth of 60.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PX

The strongest argument for PX centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : PX

The primary concerns for PX are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. A P/E of 76.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while PX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 60.8% — sustainability is the question.

PX generates stronger free cash flow (1.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BAM scores higher overall (77/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 48.9% margins and 60.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

P10 Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Praxair, Inc. produces and distributes industrial gases. The company is headquartered in Danbury, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?