WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 116% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $4.82B). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 6.2%. BAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.36. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

BAM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BAM.

OSKUndervalued (+33.0%)

Margin of Safety

+33.0%

Fair Value

$260.30

Current Price

$137.97

$122.33 discount

UndervaluedFair: $260.30Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Profit MarginProfitability
51.6%10/10

Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
67.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$79.93B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
15.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.7%2/10

Earnings declined 20.7%

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.302/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while OSK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor ASSET MANAGEMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

BAM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 51.6% margins and 31.1% revenue growth. OSK offers better value entry with a 33.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?