WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsMorgan Stanley (MS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Morgan Stanley generates 1419% more annual revenue ($73.17B vs $4.82B). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 24.7%. BAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.36. MS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

BAM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9

MS

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Profit MarginProfitability
51.6%10/10

Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
67.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$79.93B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

MS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$299.95B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
40.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.6%

Profit MarginProfitability
24.7%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.3%8/10

16.3% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.7%2/10

Earnings declined 20.7%

MS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.334/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-7.85B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MS

The strongest argument for MS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.7% and operating margin at 40.6%. Revenue growth of 16.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MS

The primary concerns for MS are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor ASSET MANAGEMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 66/100), backed by strong 24.7% margins and 16.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Morgan Stanley

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in the Morgan Stanley Building, Midtown Manhattan, New York City.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?