Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsGladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$46.63
-1.69%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $75.49B
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation
$19.42
-0.26%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $439.89M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. generates 5699% more annual revenue ($5.74B vs $98.93M). BAM leads profitability with a 48.9% profit margin vs 48.7%. BAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.05. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 77/100 (B+).
BAM
Strong Buy77
out of 100
Grade: B+
GLAD
Strong Buy66
out of 100
Grade: B-
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Keeps 49 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 68.7%
Revenue surging 60.8% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Earnings expanding 47.4% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 49 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 74.3%
Earnings expanding 68.8% YoY
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
Trading at 9.9x book value
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 6.0% — below average capital efficiency
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BAM
The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 48.9% and operating margin at 68.7%. Revenue growth of 60.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : GLAD
The strongest argument for GLAD centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 48.7% and operating margin at 74.3%. Revenue growth of 13.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : BAM
The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : GLAD
The primary concerns for GLAD are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BAM profiles as a growth stock while GLAD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
BAM is growing revenue faster at 60.8% — sustainability is the question.
BAM generates stronger free cash flow (393M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BAM scores higher overall (77/100 vs 66/100), backed by strong 48.9% margins and 60.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.
Visit Website →Gladstone Capital Corporation
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) is a leading publicly traded business development company that focuses on delivering tailored debt and equity financing to lower middle-market enterprises, facilitating their growth and strategic initiatives. Committed to a disciplined investment strategy centered on capital preservation, GLAD seeks to provide investors with attractive risk-adjusted returns through a diverse array of financing options, including term loans and equity investments. With a seasoned management team equipped with deep industry expertise, Gladstone Capital is strategically positioned to adapt to evolving market conditions, fostering enduring partnerships with portfolio companies and driving sustainable value creation.
Compare with Other ASSET MANAGEMENT Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?