WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsEquus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. generates 375752% more annual revenue ($5.07B vs $1.35M). BAM leads profitability with a 49.7% profit margin vs 0.0%. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

BAM

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.97

EQS

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -2.41

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
49.7%10/10

Keeps 50 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
64.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 64.5%

Market CapQuality
$76.95B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.8%8/10

Revenue surging 23.8% year-over-year

EQS2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.119/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.5x4/10

Trading at 9.5x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EQS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$17.04M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-100.3%2/10

ROE of -100.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 49.7% and operating margin at 64.5%. Revenue growth of 23.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : EQS

The strongest argument for EQS centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : EQS

The primary concerns for EQS are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while EQS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 23.8% — sustainability is the question.

BAM generates stronger free cash flow (339M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BAM scores higher overall (68/100 vs 21/100), backed by strong 49.7% margins and 23.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Equus Total Return Closed Fund

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Equus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS) is a closed-end investment vehicle focused on achieving long-term capital appreciation through strategic investments in distressed and undervalued equity and debt securities. The Fund employs a disciplined investment methodology that capitalizes on unique market opportunities, supported by expert collaboration to maximize return potential. With a diversified portfolio designed to effectively navigate complex turnaround scenarios, EQS presents institutional investors with a compelling platform for capital deployment, underscored by a commitment to rigorous risk management principles.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?