WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsAxa Equitable Holdings Inc (EQH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Axa Equitable Holdings Inc generates 85% more annual revenue ($10.62B vs $5.74B). BAM leads profitability with a 48.9% profit margin vs -8.7%. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 77/100 (B+).

BAM

Strong Buy

77

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.97

EQH

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.16

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Profit MarginProfitability
48.9%10/10

Keeps 49 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
68.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 68.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
60.8%10/10

Revenue surging 60.8% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$75.49B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

EPS GrowthGrowth
47.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 47.4% YoY

EQH2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1244.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1244.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-4.8910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
10.1x4/10

Trading at 10.1x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
6.0%3/10

ROE of 6.0% — below average capital efficiency

EQH4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-301.1%2/10

ROE of -301.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-29.8%2/10

Revenue declined 29.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.162/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 48.9% and operating margin at 68.7%. Revenue growth of 60.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : EQH

The strongest argument for EQH centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : EQH

The primary concerns for EQH are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while EQH is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 60.8% — sustainability is the question.

EQH generates stronger free cash flow (633M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BAM scores higher overall (77/100 vs 37/100), backed by strong 48.9% margins and 60.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Axa Equitable Holdings Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Equitable Holdings, Inc. is a globally diversified financial services company. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?