Brookfield Asset Management Inc (BAM)vsCohen & Steers Inc (CNS)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
$42.87
-1.08%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $70.28B
CNS
Cohen & Steers Inc
$61.90
-1.89%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $3.24B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Inc generates 766% more annual revenue ($4.82B vs $556.12M). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 27.6%. CNS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.98. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).
BAM
Strong Buy66
out of 100
Grade: B-
CNS
Buy59
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-400.1%
Fair Value
$10.47
Current Price
$42.87
$32.40 premium
Margin of Safety
-220.9%
Fair Value
$20.20
Current Price
$61.90
$41.70 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%
Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit
Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit
Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Growing faster than its price suggests
Strong operational efficiency at 28.0%
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
Trading at 8.5x book value
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 20.7%
2.9% revenue growth
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 24.5%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BAM
The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : CNS
The strongest argument for CNS centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, PEG Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.6% and operating margin at 28.0%. PEG of 0.98 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BAM
The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : CNS
The primary concerns for CNS are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BAM profiles as a growth stock while CNS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.29 — expect wider price swings.
BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.
BAM generates stronger free cash flow (706M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BAM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 59/100), backed by strong 51.6% margins and 31.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.
Visit Website →Cohen & Steers Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Cohen & Steers, Inc. is a publicly owned asset management portfolio company. The company is headquartered in New York, with additional offices in London, United Kingdom; Central, Hong Kong; Tokyo, Japan; and Seattle, Washington.
Visit Website →Compare with Other ASSET MANAGEMENT Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?