WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 7404% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $13.55B). BABA leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -1.6%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.56. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

BABA

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.39

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABASignificantly Overvalued (-298.4%)

Margin of Safety

-298.4%

Fair Value

$38.22

Current Price

$129.87

$91.65 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.22Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WPP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$299.57B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Free Cash FlowQuality
$36.03B10/10

Generating 36.0B in free cash flow

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BABA3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
-70.9%2/10

Earnings declined 70.9%

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow, Price/Book.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BABA profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

WPP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.

BABA is growing revenue faster at 1.7% — sustainability is the question.

BABA generates stronger free cash flow (36.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (49/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?