Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsWhirlpool Corporation (WHR)
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$131.88
+1.11%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $321.85B
WHR
Whirlpool Corporation
$54.64
-1.01%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $3.52B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 6449% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $15.52B). BABA leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs 2.0%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.80. WHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).
BABA
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
WHR
Buy51
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+72.9%
Fair Value
$562.19
Current Price
$131.88
$430.31 discount
Margin of Safety
+72.1%
Fair Value
$332.46
Current Price
$54.64
$277.82 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
1.7% revenue growth
Earnings declined 70.9%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
2.0% margin — thin
Operating margin of 3.4%
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 0.9%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BABA
The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : WHR
The strongest argument for WHR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BABA
The primary concerns for BABA are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : WHR
The primary concerns for WHR are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
WHR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
BABA is growing revenue faster at 1.7% — sustainability is the question.
WHR generates stronger free cash flow (1.0B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor INTERNET RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
WHR scores higher overall (51/100 vs 50/100). BABA offers better value entry with a 72.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.
Whirlpool Corporation
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA
The Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances, headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States.
Compare with Other INTERNET RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?