WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 21287% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $4.75B). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs 8.9%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.56. Q earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

BABA

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.39

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABASignificantly Overvalued (-298.4%)

Margin of Safety

-298.4%

Fair Value

$38.22

Current Price

$129.87

$91.65 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.22Overvalued
QSignificantly Overvalued (-410.3%)

Margin of Safety

-410.3%

Fair Value

$22.44

Current Price

$120.26

$97.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$299.57B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Free Cash FlowQuality
$36.03B10/10

Generating 36.0B in free cash flow

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

BABA3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
-70.9%2/10

Earnings declined 70.9%

Q4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.414/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow, Price/Book.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

Q is growing revenue faster at 8.1% — sustainability is the question.

BABA generates stronger free cash flow (36.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor INTERNET RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (49/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?